Main results page       Management log-in       Back to main web site

---

FRIDAY MORNING (22-MAY-26)

Pair 2 - Vina Shah / Naren Shah
Place: 3, Percentage: 57.64%

Board No	vs Pr	Contract	Lead	Result	Score	Matchpoints	%
Board 1	9: Andrew Browne / Brigid Marland	1 S	KH	11	200	1	17%
Board 2	9: Andrew Browne / Brigid Marland	2 W	9H	10	-170	4	67%
Board 3	9: Andrew Browne / Brigid Marland	2 S	2S	9	140	5	83%
Board 4	5: Margaret Giebels / Jill Hislop	4 S	2S	10	-620	1	17%
Board 5	5: Margaret Giebels / Jill Hislop	4 S	AH	11	-650	4	67%
Board 6	5: Margaret Giebels / Jill Hislop	2 N	2H	8	-110	6	100%
Board 7	4: Anne Gardiner / Gloria Newton	3NT E	4D	11	660	2	33%
Board 8	4: Anne Gardiner / Gloria Newton	3NT S	3C	8	50	6	100%
Board 9	4: Anne Gardiner / Gloria Newton	3 E	5S	6	-300	0	0%
Board 13	7: Lyn Tracey / Richard Spelman	3 N	AD	8	100	5	83%
Board 14	7: Lyn Tracey / Richard Spelman	3 W	JH	8	-50	4	67%
Board 15	7: Lyn Tracey / Richard Spelman	3NT S	3D	10	-630	0	0%
Board 16	1: Merle Thomas / Anne Russell	2 E	KC	6	200	5	83%
Board 17	1: Merle Thomas / Anne Russell	2 N	QD	8	110	5	83%
Board 18	1: Merle Thomas / Anne Russell	4 W	5S	11	-150	1	17%
Board 19	3: Ruth Hoffensetz / Mel Gilmour	2 N	AH	8	-110	4	67%
Board 20	3: Ruth Hoffensetz / Mel Gilmour	4 W	QD	10	620	5	83%
Board 21	3: Ruth Hoffensetz / Mel Gilmour	4 W	9C	9	-50	1	17%
Board 22	8: Margaret Mobbs / Diane McClintock	3NT S	3H	10	430	6	100%
Board 23	8: Margaret Mobbs / Diane McClintock	2NT E	3C	6	200	6	100%
Board 24	8: Margaret Mobbs / Diane McClintock	3 S	6C	10	130	4	67%
Board 25	6: Andrew Sharp / Sue Sharp	3NT E	2C	9	-600	2	33%
Board 26	6: Andrew Sharp / Sue Sharp	3NT E	7D	11	-660	2	33%
Board 27	6: Andrew Sharp / Sue Sharp	4 N	5D	10	420	4	67%

Click on the Board Number to display that complete board, or click on a Pair to show that Pair's performance.

     Back to this session's results